To Debate or Not Debate

Since 1976 political debates have been a much anticipated part of the election process. It is a format by which a candidate can express his views and differences from his counterpart. This process is not just a formality viewed by the citizens but is actually expected. What better way to see, hear, comprehend, process, relate and hear the plans and ‘promises’ of the ones who want to lead us? Imagine, a presidential election year whereby you do not get to watch a debate. How misleading could this be? To cast a blind vote in the direction of a ‘name’ would be claustrophobic to our government. A political debate is the citizen’s way of watching the candidates go through the interview and application process.

Sheriff D. Brad Riley as quietly asserted that he is open to a debate with challenger David Graham. It is time for our Sheriff candidates to agree to a forum and rules for a much deserved debate. We citizens expect nothing less than to see our two candidates asking and answering questions from the opposing candidate, debate narrator, and audience.

The forum and theme of questions should be no less than unrestricted, open history, both job and personal. Every application for any job asks for full work history, both present and past, information on past drug usage, financials, driving history, criminal history, and a full check of references, both work and personal. The objective is to get the best possible applicant. This should be no less invasive than the usual polygraph or oral board.

So Sheriff D. Brad Riley and Mr. David Graham, are you ready to rumble?