It blows my mind. Sheriff D. Brad Riley can do no wrong with his supporters. Literally, if we were to find out that the good sheriff killed someone, his supporters would still make excuses and find a way to justify it. How can this be? I believe it has to do with a feeling of importance in an otherwise boring or underachieving life. Quite possibly even a feeling of ‘does my life have meaning?” To be associated with Lindsay Lohan, with many, would still be an association. It equals a feeling of importance. How pathetic is that? Would you Riley supporters be proud of your children if they lied, cheated, stole and destroyed? Why else would former Sheriff Robert Canaday say “Thanks to all for supporting Sheriff Brad Riley. Please get as many as you can to go Vote on Nov. 2. I would be a shame to let such a fine law enforcement professional get away from us. We need him right here in Cabarrus County”. If Robert Canaday were so concerned for Cabarrus County he would be making these comments about David Graham. I have given it much thought. Do you know why Canaday can’t let it go? Because to do so would be to admit that he was wrong. If be didn’t stubbornly march forward against reasoning and right it would be to admit that his life’s work may be forgotten that much sooner. Did Lenin really want to go with Stalin? No! But to change “horses” at this stage of the game would be reversing his genius foresight for the future. Aww, but the Soviet Union did collapse.
What does it say to Cabarrus County voter’s that Sheriff D. Brad Riley’s trusted retired Captain Tommy Furr is out destroying David Graham’s signs? Riley first said he did not know that man in the picture. Of course, most people immediately identified the man. I find it interesting that you can go to Riley’s facebook page and so many of his followers make excuses for it. They even try to throw the focus back at Graham, a man who is clearly taking the high road. What great lengths his followers will go to. It was important enough for 36 News to cover it. But of course the Riley supporters are not so interested. Riley supporters will make every excuse to deny the truth. This is the same reason why the United States can not reason with Ahmadinejad. He can’t even admit that the holocaust happened. You know he knows it happened. But he will never give us the satisfaction of admitting it. To do so would mean to let go of his hatred and stubbornness. If he saw an American flag, he would tear it down and destroy it. And if he were caught on camera he would swear it was the wind.
We are dealing with an immature, childish, spoiled sheriff’s office. One unable to combat the problems of the 21st century. The good ol’ boy system has gone on long enough. It is time to hold an office accountable. Roberts to Canaday, Canaday to Riley. What did he do to earn it? I still have not heard. Stop this corrupt administration dead in its tracks. What more proof do you need then Tommy Furr destroying signs? Shouldn’t this give all of us an idea of what the future holds under Riley’s reign?
Wednesday, October 27, 2010
Saturday, October 23, 2010
Riley on Crime in Cabarrus County.mov
Anyone who hasn’t seen the informative youtube video just released by Sheriff D. Brad Riley should make every attempt to watch it. It is truly inspirational. First, he points out that it is important for citizens to know that last year violent crime was down 36% and property crime down 12%. It is typical that a politician tells you want ‘he wants you to know’, rather than ‘what you want to know’. Why are you telling us now? Oh wait, yes now I remember, the election is less than two weeks away. Could it be because your job is on the line? Yes, it’s coming back to me now. Why are people thinking a whole lot worse than they thought before? Who are you speaking for? Is this to scare us? You, Sheriff seem to be the desperate one. Your deputies are pushing the envelope? Yes, I have read all the comments. They push the envelope after licking the stamp. So property crime has decreased by 12%? Where do you get your ‘gambit’ numbers? We are glad you are satisfied with your department’s accomplishments. However, I would like to point out that their job ‘is’ to patrol and be seen. I wonder if the citizens are satisfied with the services ‘you’ provide. The deputies should be visible. It does deter crime. But why are you not visible sir? So you want to communicate with the citizens now? What storm are you referring to? The election storm? The one sweeping you off of your feet? Yes, quite the storm indeed. You suggest we keep the community intact? So if you are voted out are you suggesting that we are losing our community? Our community is more than you Sheriff Riley. You obviously think highly of yourself. You are right however. This is an important time. That is precisely what I have been saying for the past few months. Why is this not the time to change horses in the middle of the stream? Thoroughbreds can swim. However, donkeys will not cross! So the worst thing you can say about David Graham is that he is retired? Thanks for going easy on him. But I dare say, I don’t think he will be retired much longer. Why is your time now? Because you are in the middle of it? Yes, you very well may come up short, thanks to Sheriff Canaday. If only he would have retired a little sooner.
Tuesday, October 19, 2010
Time Is Running Out
As we enter election time it is important to reflect what this blog has revealed to us in the past months. There have been numerous questions and concerns that have been asked. Obviously the local news outlets don’t do their jobs. It is too bad the Tribune and its journalists don’t care enough about this community to challenge the candidates all; sheriff, district attorney, county commissioners and clerks, to the slightest bit of interest or scrutiny to allow our citizens to be served by the best possible person. It seems a shame that the Tribune doesn’t understand what should be a sense of responsibility, or maybe they do understand. So what is our alternative when the papers protect their own favorites and ignore their obvious duties? Citizens who are fed up will take matters into the hands in the form of blogs. What have we learned about the 2 ton, ignored elephant in the room?
Sheriff D. Brad Riley does read this blog but does not have interest to answer to the easiest of questions. Of course, no one expected him to grace this site with his presence, but why not the newspaper or his websites? He did feel the need to slightly address concerns about overpopulation in the jail. But what of all the surrounding concerns? Mr. Riley has not been held accountable to his county citizens. Born here, raised here…whatever! Shouldn’t he face the music? Is this the leadership we deserve? There is no leadership at all. Not only will he dodge press conferences designed by him but won’t so much as return a phone call.
That many of his deputies are selfish, ruthless, profane, egotistical, suspicious people that do not deserve to wear badges and guns. Now with that said, most are outstanding men and women who love this community. These are the ones who need our support and new leadership. The most vocal and sometimes profane deputies, voice concerns so extreme that it shows the frustration clear and true. Most want change and need direction. Others want the ones who think differently then them to leave, telling them they are unwanted and unwelcome in their own department. Does this not scream to us, the citizens, of the turmoil in the sheriff’s office? It is an attitude born from the top. Sheriff Riley supporters claim these vulgar employees can not be tamed by the sheriff. If he can not control this own, then how can he lead them.
The time is now to bring about change and new leadership. Sheriff Riley has had an opportunity to make an impression upon all of us; whether good or bad. Have the undecided voters taken their responsibility seriously? Have they done research and met David Graham? He is a man with outstanding credentials and more importantly than that, he is a man who is respected by ALL who know him. He represents true professionalism and leadership. He has run an outstanding campaign. Let us not miss this opportunity to read our compasses correctly. It is time to sail in the right direction.
Sheriff D. Brad Riley does read this blog but does not have interest to answer to the easiest of questions. Of course, no one expected him to grace this site with his presence, but why not the newspaper or his websites? He did feel the need to slightly address concerns about overpopulation in the jail. But what of all the surrounding concerns? Mr. Riley has not been held accountable to his county citizens. Born here, raised here…whatever! Shouldn’t he face the music? Is this the leadership we deserve? There is no leadership at all. Not only will he dodge press conferences designed by him but won’t so much as return a phone call.
That many of his deputies are selfish, ruthless, profane, egotistical, suspicious people that do not deserve to wear badges and guns. Now with that said, most are outstanding men and women who love this community. These are the ones who need our support and new leadership. The most vocal and sometimes profane deputies, voice concerns so extreme that it shows the frustration clear and true. Most want change and need direction. Others want the ones who think differently then them to leave, telling them they are unwanted and unwelcome in their own department. Does this not scream to us, the citizens, of the turmoil in the sheriff’s office? It is an attitude born from the top. Sheriff Riley supporters claim these vulgar employees can not be tamed by the sheriff. If he can not control this own, then how can he lead them.
The time is now to bring about change and new leadership. Sheriff Riley has had an opportunity to make an impression upon all of us; whether good or bad. Have the undecided voters taken their responsibility seriously? Have they done research and met David Graham? He is a man with outstanding credentials and more importantly than that, he is a man who is respected by ALL who know him. He represents true professionalism and leadership. He has run an outstanding campaign. Let us not miss this opportunity to read our compasses correctly. It is time to sail in the right direction.
Friday, September 3, 2010
To Debate or Not Debate
Since 1976 political debates have been a much anticipated part of the election process. It is a format by which a candidate can express his views and differences from his counterpart. This process is not just a formality viewed by the citizens but is actually expected. What better way to see, hear, comprehend, process, relate and hear the plans and ‘promises’ of the ones who want to lead us? Imagine, a presidential election year whereby you do not get to watch a debate. How misleading could this be? To cast a blind vote in the direction of a ‘name’ would be claustrophobic to our government. A political debate is the citizen’s way of watching the candidates go through the interview and application process.
Sheriff D. Brad Riley as quietly asserted that he is open to a debate with challenger David Graham. It is time for our Sheriff candidates to agree to a forum and rules for a much deserved debate. We citizens expect nothing less than to see our two candidates asking and answering questions from the opposing candidate, debate narrator, and audience.
The forum and theme of questions should be no less than unrestricted, open history, both job and personal. Every application for any job asks for full work history, both present and past, information on past drug usage, financials, driving history, criminal history, and a full check of references, both work and personal. The objective is to get the best possible applicant. This should be no less invasive than the usual polygraph or oral board.
So Sheriff D. Brad Riley and Mr. David Graham, are you ready to rumble?
Sheriff D. Brad Riley as quietly asserted that he is open to a debate with challenger David Graham. It is time for our Sheriff candidates to agree to a forum and rules for a much deserved debate. We citizens expect nothing less than to see our two candidates asking and answering questions from the opposing candidate, debate narrator, and audience.
The forum and theme of questions should be no less than unrestricted, open history, both job and personal. Every application for any job asks for full work history, both present and past, information on past drug usage, financials, driving history, criminal history, and a full check of references, both work and personal. The objective is to get the best possible applicant. This should be no less invasive than the usual polygraph or oral board.
So Sheriff D. Brad Riley and Mr. David Graham, are you ready to rumble?
Thursday, August 26, 2010
Charlotte's Crime 'Is' Cabarrus County's Crime
If you believe for one second that by re-electing Sheriff D. Brad Riley to another term as Cabarrus County sheriff that you receive immunity for Charlotte’s crime, then think again. Much of Charlotte’s crime originates right here in our ‘protected’ county. This weekend two of Cabarrus County’s homegrown murdered a Charlotte man, their so called drug dealer, to support their heroin addiction, as reported by the Charlotte Observer. Cabarrus County, and especially Harrisburg, should feel lucky that his brutal crime didn’t occur in their neighborhoods. Jonathan Fitzgerald, 18, and Danielle Holmes, 17, were known to the Cabarrus Sheriff’s Office. This being the case, what is Sheriff Riley doing to protect Cabarrus County from drug runners who funnel heroin into our area? We very rarely see information of drug arrests in Cabarrus County. What is being done? In this case it took the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department to clean up this mess, making the arrests in Cabarrus County. Sheriff Riley is quoted in the Independent Tribune as saying, “Our officers heavily assisted in the arrests,” Riley said. It was literally the very least he could do. Although Sheriff Riley does give a shout out to his brave officers, he is clearly acknowledging that it took Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Department to rid Cabarrus County of these young murderers. My point is this. Sheriff Riley tries repeatedly to imply that by not re-electing him that we are inviting Charlotte’s problems to Cabarrus County. Too late! This is not the Cabarrus County of 1958 to 1982. It is not even the same Cabarrus County as 10 years ago. Cabarrus County has big league problems and needs a big league hitter. We need someone who has fought the big league fights and can readily identify and combat these problems. This is the time to change the course of fate for Cabarrus County. The problems of drugs, gangs, theft, and murder are here. They have been for quite a while. Let’s bring in a man that has the experience to fix this mess.
Monday, August 9, 2010
Overcrowding in the NEW Jail Part 2
I find it interesting that after the posting on July 16th, and with the help of the always on top of the story Independent Tribune, that Sheriff D. Brad Riley finally offers up an explanation to our concerns. Unfortunately, Sheriff Riley tries to shift blame and only tells half truths. As promised on July 16th, I will explain what Sheriff Riley has attempted to leave out.
Let’s begin with Sheriff Riley’s first, and my personal favorite, opinionated quote. “With the new annex, we don’t have the ability to sleep them on the floor like we do on the old linear floor,” Riley said. “Not only is it becoming grossly overcrowded, but all the services…are increased and heightened and certainly something that needs to be looked at,” he said. News flash!!! No kidding. I thought that is what we started doing in 2001. So after 200 million dollars spent on construction that is still not operational do you think something needs to be ‘looked at’? Were you not intimately involved in the suggesting that there needs to be extra walling in the design of the jail? Sheriff, weren’t you the primary one who made these strong suggestions that caused the design price of the jail to sore from 50 million to 200 million. Something DOES need to be looked at. The sheriff’s election in November.
“When you start looking at cost, it doesn’t compare to putting bodies in a new facility,” Riley said. “But at the same time there is a lot of risk that goes along with that. We’re still looking at least 11 months of the current track we’re on”. Will someone please explain to me what in the hell Riley is trying to say? Sheriff you are very informative. What I would like for you do explain to the county tax payers and Independent Tribune is why you failed to ask for the staffing for this project until January. At least this is what our Cabarrus County Chairman Jay White has said. I would like to hear you explain why you failed to budget money to transport inmates to other facilities. Isn’t this one of the big reasons for our jail overcrowding now? What about the extra costs of time, salaries of transporting officers, gas, not to include board. How can money not be budgeted for transportation when jail administrators know of the overcrowding problem?
Sheriff why do you not use the jail population projection models that almost every other jail in the state uses? These projections can be so actuate that at any given point throughout the year we would know within a few percent what the jail population would be. But why do you refuse to use these projection models? You think in the end all you have to do is tell your friend Jay White that all the budgeting problems can be rectified by chalking it all up as “unexpected cost”?
And again Commissioner Chairman Jay White brings up the rear. “I would suggest we keep tabs on this to make certain we see what can be done to ensure things do not get out of control,” White said. Thank you Mr. Chairman for looking out for our best interest. I get the feeling that you are all over it. Start by holding Sheriff Riley accountable rather than making excuses for him. It does not look good that you do everything in your power to protect Sheriff Riley in the same year that you are up for re-election. It is no secret that Sheriff Riley blames the County Commissioner’s for these mis-calculations. Chairman, do your job. You are not Mr. Koch. Think of ways to make Cabarrus County a better place, not looking after Sheriff Riley.
Let’s begin with Sheriff Riley’s first, and my personal favorite, opinionated quote. “With the new annex, we don’t have the ability to sleep them on the floor like we do on the old linear floor,” Riley said. “Not only is it becoming grossly overcrowded, but all the services…are increased and heightened and certainly something that needs to be looked at,” he said. News flash!!! No kidding. I thought that is what we started doing in 2001. So after 200 million dollars spent on construction that is still not operational do you think something needs to be ‘looked at’? Were you not intimately involved in the suggesting that there needs to be extra walling in the design of the jail? Sheriff, weren’t you the primary one who made these strong suggestions that caused the design price of the jail to sore from 50 million to 200 million. Something DOES need to be looked at. The sheriff’s election in November.
“When you start looking at cost, it doesn’t compare to putting bodies in a new facility,” Riley said. “But at the same time there is a lot of risk that goes along with that. We’re still looking at least 11 months of the current track we’re on”. Will someone please explain to me what in the hell Riley is trying to say? Sheriff you are very informative. What I would like for you do explain to the county tax payers and Independent Tribune is why you failed to ask for the staffing for this project until January. At least this is what our Cabarrus County Chairman Jay White has said. I would like to hear you explain why you failed to budget money to transport inmates to other facilities. Isn’t this one of the big reasons for our jail overcrowding now? What about the extra costs of time, salaries of transporting officers, gas, not to include board. How can money not be budgeted for transportation when jail administrators know of the overcrowding problem?
Sheriff why do you not use the jail population projection models that almost every other jail in the state uses? These projections can be so actuate that at any given point throughout the year we would know within a few percent what the jail population would be. But why do you refuse to use these projection models? You think in the end all you have to do is tell your friend Jay White that all the budgeting problems can be rectified by chalking it all up as “unexpected cost”?
And again Commissioner Chairman Jay White brings up the rear. “I would suggest we keep tabs on this to make certain we see what can be done to ensure things do not get out of control,” White said. Thank you Mr. Chairman for looking out for our best interest. I get the feeling that you are all over it. Start by holding Sheriff Riley accountable rather than making excuses for him. It does not look good that you do everything in your power to protect Sheriff Riley in the same year that you are up for re-election. It is no secret that Sheriff Riley blames the County Commissioner’s for these mis-calculations. Chairman, do your job. You are not Mr. Koch. Think of ways to make Cabarrus County a better place, not looking after Sheriff Riley.
Friday, July 23, 2010
The First Amendment
Wow! Where do I start? Yes, let’s start with the 1st amendment. Why did our forefathers put this one first? Because it is that important! When laying the basic foundation of our government, this is what they thought MOST important. This is my 5th post. I have outlined my opinion, my prospective, my concerns and now my rebuttal. Have I at any point, threatened, slandered or made any type of false accusation? We in America may ask any question of our public official? They represent us. King George III would have taken Thomas Jefferson’s head given the chance. What high treason have I committed? I voice my opinion and allow others to comment and for that I should fear my personal well being or life? I’ll touch more or that later.
Although I have only expressed my opinion, prospective, concerns and now rebuttal, I am advised that an investigation into my identity will lead to my physical harm. First of all, make certain you launch this investigation privately outside of sheriff’s office time and resources. Otherwise, I would strongly assert that this would not only be an abuse of power but down right illegal. Let me guide you on this issue. Secondly you want to make sure this is construed to the district’s office as a ‘criminal investigation’. After that and thirdly, contact your local cyber crime task force, sell them the oceanfront property in Arizona, and commence to laying out your paper trail. After this, do your search warrant for evidence, like you would actually find something. Fifth, get an attorney. Besides free speech, gun ownership and quartering soldiers, the other big thing on Thomas Jefferson’s mind was the 4th amendment.
You say, “Someone is going to get "hurt". (not mentally but, physically or worse) It is not a matter of "if" something happens but, "when". Let me say this. If you have a loose cannon on your hands, this is something that you should be ready to deal with. This is not a site designed to destroy or tear anyone’s life apart. This is a site where people can ‘FREELY’ register their opinions. And from what I have observed, there are a lot of opinions. Just because these opinions are different from yours doesn’t mean you dispatch your legions to squash the very law giving “We the People” a voice.
The way I see it Sheriff you have three choices. First, you can illegally call on your powers to identify me. Do you not think that I have given this some thought? Do you really want to shake this tree? I will be entitled to serve my own subpoenas, call for depositions, call witnesses and put YOU on the stand. I will guarantee most of the IP addresses are referenced FROM the sheriff’s office. This is a mighty big tree.
Second, you can follow through on your threats. However, don’t think I haven’t taken my precautions. If I get killed in a car wreck, get hit by a bus, get struck by lightning or slip on a banana peel, be ready for the full onslaught of investigators.
Or, lastly, you can sit behind your desk, meet with your administration on what should be done next, in the end do nothing, and let freedom of speech be shouted in its 235th year.
Although I have only expressed my opinion, prospective, concerns and now rebuttal, I am advised that an investigation into my identity will lead to my physical harm. First of all, make certain you launch this investigation privately outside of sheriff’s office time and resources. Otherwise, I would strongly assert that this would not only be an abuse of power but down right illegal. Let me guide you on this issue. Secondly you want to make sure this is construed to the district’s office as a ‘criminal investigation’. After that and thirdly, contact your local cyber crime task force, sell them the oceanfront property in Arizona, and commence to laying out your paper trail. After this, do your search warrant for evidence, like you would actually find something. Fifth, get an attorney. Besides free speech, gun ownership and quartering soldiers, the other big thing on Thomas Jefferson’s mind was the 4th amendment.
You say, “Someone is going to get "hurt". (not mentally but, physically or worse) It is not a matter of "if" something happens but, "when". Let me say this. If you have a loose cannon on your hands, this is something that you should be ready to deal with. This is not a site designed to destroy or tear anyone’s life apart. This is a site where people can ‘FREELY’ register their opinions. And from what I have observed, there are a lot of opinions. Just because these opinions are different from yours doesn’t mean you dispatch your legions to squash the very law giving “We the People” a voice.
The way I see it Sheriff you have three choices. First, you can illegally call on your powers to identify me. Do you not think that I have given this some thought? Do you really want to shake this tree? I will be entitled to serve my own subpoenas, call for depositions, call witnesses and put YOU on the stand. I will guarantee most of the IP addresses are referenced FROM the sheriff’s office. This is a mighty big tree.
Second, you can follow through on your threats. However, don’t think I haven’t taken my precautions. If I get killed in a car wreck, get hit by a bus, get struck by lightning or slip on a banana peel, be ready for the full onslaught of investigators.
Or, lastly, you can sit behind your desk, meet with your administration on what should be done next, in the end do nothing, and let freedom of speech be shouted in its 235th year.
Friday, July 16, 2010
Overcrowding in the NEW Jail
It amazes me that after years of planning and careful consideration on our new sheriff’s office and jail complex that we are still not completed. Not only are we not completed, the old jail and NEW annex jail are completely overcrowded. How is it that there is so much overcrowding in the Cabarrus County Jail’s?
A few days ago a lady sent me a facebook message in reference to her son. She explained how he had been jailed (for the first time) and was overwhelmed by the conditions that he found himself in. He was given a mat and told to sleep on the floor. The cell was so overcrowded that he literally had to step over people to make his way to the toilet and shower. He asked if he could get a bed and was told that the jail was over populated. After telling his mother she attempted to contact Sheriff Riley to register her concern. As of the time of the writing, Sheriff Riley never contacted her back. She was not disputing the reason why her son was in jail. No doubt many will say he shouldn’t have been there to begin with. But as a tax payer, a mother, a citizen, she asks...”Why are the conditions in the Cabarrus County Jail’s so bad?”
After all this money spent, why is there overcrowding? Why after all this planning is the new jail still ill equipped in housing inmates? Isn’t this the reason the FBI strongly suggested that the county build new state of the art jails to begin with? And why isn’t the main complex completed? Why is there a delay on the inspection? Why does the sheriff not return phone calls to caring mothers?
Actually, I have a great explanation for all these questions, which I will be happy to reveal very soon. In the meanwhile, anyone reading this post that has concerns they would like addressed, feel free to do as the mother of the jailed son. Send a facebook message to Sharon Wentworth. After verification that the complaint is real, we may just ask for the answers.
A few days ago a lady sent me a facebook message in reference to her son. She explained how he had been jailed (for the first time) and was overwhelmed by the conditions that he found himself in. He was given a mat and told to sleep on the floor. The cell was so overcrowded that he literally had to step over people to make his way to the toilet and shower. He asked if he could get a bed and was told that the jail was over populated. After telling his mother she attempted to contact Sheriff Riley to register her concern. As of the time of the writing, Sheriff Riley never contacted her back. She was not disputing the reason why her son was in jail. No doubt many will say he shouldn’t have been there to begin with. But as a tax payer, a mother, a citizen, she asks...”Why are the conditions in the Cabarrus County Jail’s so bad?”
After all this money spent, why is there overcrowding? Why after all this planning is the new jail still ill equipped in housing inmates? Isn’t this the reason the FBI strongly suggested that the county build new state of the art jails to begin with? And why isn’t the main complex completed? Why is there a delay on the inspection? Why does the sheriff not return phone calls to caring mothers?
Actually, I have a great explanation for all these questions, which I will be happy to reveal very soon. In the meanwhile, anyone reading this post that has concerns they would like addressed, feel free to do as the mother of the jailed son. Send a facebook message to Sharon Wentworth. After verification that the complaint is real, we may just ask for the answers.
Sunday, June 27, 2010
Issues and Concerns
So the pro-Riley camp thinks I and others should take any concerns or evidence and meet with Sheriff Riley face to face in an open door setting. Mr. Pro-Riley supporter let me say that I don’t believe you would make a very good detective. Card players generally don’t show their hands during the game. You should stay in the patrol division Lieutenant. What good would meeting with Mr. Riley be? What do you think his response would be? Would he call in Mr. Koch for an ‘independent’ review of the evidence and allegations? I am under the impression that the State Bureau of Investigation would make a more thorough independent review. But thanks for the offer, of course if it were yours to make. Actually that is not my concern. I simply believe that Sheriff Riley is not doing a good job as sheriff as outlined in many news sources. I am sure Mr. Riley is a charming man and very likeable. However, it is his job performance that I am most concerned with.
By definition:
Allegation: Something alleged; an assertion. A statement asserting something without proof.
Assertion: A positive statement or declaration, often without support or reason.
Slander: Defamation, calumny. A malice, false, and defamatory statement or report. Defamation by oral utterance rather than by writing, pictures.
As opposed to:
Truth: Actual state of matter. Conformity with fact or reality. The state of character of being true. Actuality or actual existence. An obvious or accepted fact. Honesty; integrity; truthfulness.
Proof: Evidence sufficient to establish a thing as true, or to produce belief in its truth. Anything serving as such evidence. Evidence having probative weight. The effect of evidence in convincing the mind.
We have some questions of recent concerns by readers we would like the sheriff to address. Keep in mind these are not allegations. Too often society conforms to the saying “where there’s smoke, there’s fire” without evidence of tapes and pictures. Hearsay has ruled the day, and ruined the system. Even so, these are not brought forth as allegations, rumors or slanderous statements. These are questions on the minds of the community. Presented only for what they are, questions of concern. We as citizens have the responsibility to hold our elected officials to the highest standard. They are, after all, the ones leading us?
Earliest or most recent concerns have been that:
1. Have there been election violations with trusted friends and employees? Violations of using company time, personnel and county owned assets to campaign and use for campaigning, while on duty?
2. Have there been several adulterous relationships between officers and particularly a relationship with a very high ranking officer and woman at a local fast food restaurant?
3. Did the sheriff, fire a female officer for seeking employment with the State Highway Patrol, and then settle the ensuing federal law suit for discrimination against the woman?
4. Was a married detective of the department witnessed and photographed in a sexual act, with a woman not his wife in public?
5. Did an officer make serious derogatory racial comments against a fellow officer and his wife and also many gender related comments against other officers and still did not receive serious reprimand?
6. Did an officer give his uniform and equipment to a friend to wear at the mall who then attempted to stop young women?
7. Did an officer stop his vehicle, kill a beaver for no reason and then leave the scene while an intern was in the vehicle?
8. Did an officer sneak into a fire station and shoot a fireman in the back of the head with his taser as he was sleeping?
Let’s hope that the concerns are not true. In the meanwhile, we will consider the concerns only that, and until addressed, unsubstantiated until proven accurate or at least addressed. Surely no one will rumor or consider more, remembering the solemn duty of our community is to not judge without evidence. As jurors, we swear. Of course, we should not spread rumors of which we know nothing. Keeping in mind God said to Moses, “Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor.” Exodus 20:16.
By definition:
Allegation: Something alleged; an assertion. A statement asserting something without proof.
Assertion: A positive statement or declaration, often without support or reason.
Slander: Defamation, calumny. A malice, false, and defamatory statement or report. Defamation by oral utterance rather than by writing, pictures.
As opposed to:
Truth: Actual state of matter. Conformity with fact or reality. The state of character of being true. Actuality or actual existence. An obvious or accepted fact. Honesty; integrity; truthfulness.
Proof: Evidence sufficient to establish a thing as true, or to produce belief in its truth. Anything serving as such evidence. Evidence having probative weight. The effect of evidence in convincing the mind.
We have some questions of recent concerns by readers we would like the sheriff to address. Keep in mind these are not allegations. Too often society conforms to the saying “where there’s smoke, there’s fire” without evidence of tapes and pictures. Hearsay has ruled the day, and ruined the system. Even so, these are not brought forth as allegations, rumors or slanderous statements. These are questions on the minds of the community. Presented only for what they are, questions of concern. We as citizens have the responsibility to hold our elected officials to the highest standard. They are, after all, the ones leading us?
Earliest or most recent concerns have been that:
1. Have there been election violations with trusted friends and employees? Violations of using company time, personnel and county owned assets to campaign and use for campaigning, while on duty?
2. Have there been several adulterous relationships between officers and particularly a relationship with a very high ranking officer and woman at a local fast food restaurant?
3. Did the sheriff, fire a female officer for seeking employment with the State Highway Patrol, and then settle the ensuing federal law suit for discrimination against the woman?
4. Was a married detective of the department witnessed and photographed in a sexual act, with a woman not his wife in public?
5. Did an officer make serious derogatory racial comments against a fellow officer and his wife and also many gender related comments against other officers and still did not receive serious reprimand?
6. Did an officer give his uniform and equipment to a friend to wear at the mall who then attempted to stop young women?
7. Did an officer stop his vehicle, kill a beaver for no reason and then leave the scene while an intern was in the vehicle?
8. Did an officer sneak into a fire station and shoot a fireman in the back of the head with his taser as he was sleeping?
Let’s hope that the concerns are not true. In the meanwhile, we will consider the concerns only that, and until addressed, unsubstantiated until proven accurate or at least addressed. Surely no one will rumor or consider more, remembering the solemn duty of our community is to not judge without evidence. As jurors, we swear. Of course, we should not spread rumors of which we know nothing. Keeping in mind God said to Moses, “Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor.” Exodus 20:16.
Thursday, June 3, 2010
Bella's Press Conference
After watching the news conference this past week featuring Cabarrus County Commissioner Chairman Jay White and Cabarrus County Attorney Richard Koch, I marveled at the focus, intelligence and professionalism of our unbiased, seekers of truth. I was amazed at what was on display. It is interesting in seeing after years of education, no doubt in political science, and what money in degrees, actually does for Cabarrus County. Let’s recap.
First we have Attorney Richard Koch with his ‘10 single spaced’ page report. Wow, how enlightening. So you, through a painstaking independent investigation, were able to clear the deputy. I think we all saw that one coming. In those 10 pages and one hour briefing you could have told us something we didn’t know. It is obvious that you could spend a couple of weeks reviewing the law to advise us that the deputy didn’t break it. Of course in the early 1800’s slavery was legal and women couldn’t vote. I would compare shooting Bella to law enforcement officers cheating on their spouses. It may not necessarily land them in criminal court. But let’s face it; it’s still not cool.
Chairman Jay White is a different story. He at least brought something to the table. Thank you Mr. White for the intricate explanation of the effects of a tranquilizer gun, what it can do to the body and how dangerous it can be. In contrast to say a ‘real gun’. You almost had me thankful he wasn’t trained to use it. I bet bank robbers wished the sheriff’s office only used tranquilizer guns. I, on the other hand am not. I am glad that there is an undeniable difference between the two.
And finally, where was the Sheriff? Was he golfing, traveling or hiding? Why wasn’t he invited to the party? Jeff Daniels had to be at his ‘court date’. Instead he has Mr. White and Mr. Koch ‘deferring’ questions to the sheriff who they know, good and well, has no interest in answering any of them.
Isn’t it obvious to everyone that this press conference did more to hurt Cabarrus County Government then it did to help them? To me this is the most obvious in the final scene when the only person doing their job was the young lady bailing our chairman and attorney out and putting an end to this CSPAN circus. It is my opinion that this county needs a revamp!
First we have Attorney Richard Koch with his ‘10 single spaced’ page report. Wow, how enlightening. So you, through a painstaking independent investigation, were able to clear the deputy. I think we all saw that one coming. In those 10 pages and one hour briefing you could have told us something we didn’t know. It is obvious that you could spend a couple of weeks reviewing the law to advise us that the deputy didn’t break it. Of course in the early 1800’s slavery was legal and women couldn’t vote. I would compare shooting Bella to law enforcement officers cheating on their spouses. It may not necessarily land them in criminal court. But let’s face it; it’s still not cool.
Chairman Jay White is a different story. He at least brought something to the table. Thank you Mr. White for the intricate explanation of the effects of a tranquilizer gun, what it can do to the body and how dangerous it can be. In contrast to say a ‘real gun’. You almost had me thankful he wasn’t trained to use it. I bet bank robbers wished the sheriff’s office only used tranquilizer guns. I, on the other hand am not. I am glad that there is an undeniable difference between the two.
And finally, where was the Sheriff? Was he golfing, traveling or hiding? Why wasn’t he invited to the party? Jeff Daniels had to be at his ‘court date’. Instead he has Mr. White and Mr. Koch ‘deferring’ questions to the sheriff who they know, good and well, has no interest in answering any of them.
Isn’t it obvious to everyone that this press conference did more to hurt Cabarrus County Government then it did to help them? To me this is the most obvious in the final scene when the only person doing their job was the young lady bailing our chairman and attorney out and putting an end to this CSPAN circus. It is my opinion that this county needs a revamp!
Friday, May 21, 2010
Time For A Change
Being a citizen of Cabarrus County, I am appalled by what I see and hear coming from the Cabarrus County Sheriff's Department on a daily basis. For the past few years it has been one incident after another. The latest 3 incidents have finally gained enough attention and been so news worthy that citizens of not just Cabarrus County, but the country and world, finally want to know who is in charge at the Cabarrus County Sheriff's Department.
First, we learn of two deputies, one a lieutenant, who are charged with purchasing and possessing drugs.
Second, is the story of the Cabarrus County Sheriff's Department being unable to get a man down out of a tree, so they tased or attempted to tase him, causing his fall and leading to his immediate paralysis.
And third, we have poor Bella, the family pet, who unwillingly wanting to summit to police authority, non-aggressive and unarmed, was shot and killed because the deputies were overwhelmed with calls.
So as we stare from Church Street and Corban Avenue up at the newly constructed castle and dungeon, it begs the question..."Who in the hell is running this place?" Certainly not Sheriff D. Brad Riley who is never available to answer for his departments actions. Not long ago Sheriff Riley was quoted in the Independent Tribune as saying, his deputies are the alter-ego of the sheriff. Here, Sheriff Riley acknowledges that his deputies act on his behalf. This being the case, what now is Sheriff Riley responsible for? I understand that Sheriff Riley cannot be with all his officers, at all times, making all decisions for them. It is just not practical. However, Sheriff Riley is not like any other law enforcement department head. His office is unique and there are special laws giving him special powers. Therefore, it is imperative, that when he hires personnel that he gets it right. His hiring process should weed out officers who enjoy killing animals, hurting people and drugs. This task is charged to Sheriff Riley alone. He is the person Cabarrus County is electing as sheriff. I hope citizens of this county will take in consideration the job he is actually doing and not voting on behalf of whether or not he goes to your church, coaches your kids ball teams or went to high school with you. Be responsible voters and at least consider a change. The safety of Cabarrus County is in the voters hands.
All comments are welcomed.
First, we learn of two deputies, one a lieutenant, who are charged with purchasing and possessing drugs.
Second, is the story of the Cabarrus County Sheriff's Department being unable to get a man down out of a tree, so they tased or attempted to tase him, causing his fall and leading to his immediate paralysis.
And third, we have poor Bella, the family pet, who unwillingly wanting to summit to police authority, non-aggressive and unarmed, was shot and killed because the deputies were overwhelmed with calls.
So as we stare from Church Street and Corban Avenue up at the newly constructed castle and dungeon, it begs the question..."Who in the hell is running this place?" Certainly not Sheriff D. Brad Riley who is never available to answer for his departments actions. Not long ago Sheriff Riley was quoted in the Independent Tribune as saying, his deputies are the alter-ego of the sheriff. Here, Sheriff Riley acknowledges that his deputies act on his behalf. This being the case, what now is Sheriff Riley responsible for? I understand that Sheriff Riley cannot be with all his officers, at all times, making all decisions for them. It is just not practical. However, Sheriff Riley is not like any other law enforcement department head. His office is unique and there are special laws giving him special powers. Therefore, it is imperative, that when he hires personnel that he gets it right. His hiring process should weed out officers who enjoy killing animals, hurting people and drugs. This task is charged to Sheriff Riley alone. He is the person Cabarrus County is electing as sheriff. I hope citizens of this county will take in consideration the job he is actually doing and not voting on behalf of whether or not he goes to your church, coaches your kids ball teams or went to high school with you. Be responsible voters and at least consider a change. The safety of Cabarrus County is in the voters hands.
All comments are welcomed.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)